3 Rebuttals to 3 Anti-Santorum English Language Comment on Puerto Rico

Anti-Santorum Argument #1:  Hawaii and New Mexico were admitted into the Union without an English-as-a-primary language requirement.

Pro-Santorum Rebuttal to Argument #1: When HI joined the USA in 1950 (over 60 years ago) and NM in 1912 (100 years ago), there were no socialist-motivated language controversies the way we have them today. 

Rick's remarks were prudent to make in a 21st Century America divided by socialism.

* * *

Anti-Santorum Argument #2: Santorum said this about English in PR to solidify his base.

Pro-Santorum Rebuttal to Argument #2: No.  Santorum said this as a matter of principle, not for political gain.  The fact that he said this demonstrated concrete leadership on how to admit PR as the 51 state. 

Rick unites the multilingual People of the United States through the one medium of English.  United We Stand.

(Mitt, on the other hand, seems to talk about the English issue depending on what language his audience speaks.)

* * *

Anti-Santorum Argument #3: The U.S. Constitution does not require English for admission in to the Union.

Pro-Santorum Rebuttal to Argument #3: So what?  This is irrelevant to the debate.  Santorum's remarks were prudent for a President (to be) to make as the statehood petition is debated before the U.S. Congress.

Viva Rick Santorum!